False balance
Presents two sides as equally credible when evidence strongly favours one.
Specimen
Scientists and sceptics remain divided on vaccine safety — so we've presented both perspectives.
Fabricated passage — teaching example designed for clarity.
false balance — scientific consensus and fringe view presented as equally credible
Dissection
Scientists and sceptics remain divided on vaccine safety.
- consensus misrepresented as contested
- 'both sides' implies equal weight
- false symmetry
Field notes
- Family
- Framing & omission
- Habitat
- science journalism, health reporting, political coverage
- Frequency
- found in 12% of analyzed articles
- Confused with
- One-sided sourcing , False equivalence
In the wild
"There are genuine questions on both sides about whether climate change is human-caused."
News coverage, regional daily, January 2026
"Experts disagree about evolution — so we've included creationist perspectives for balance."
Education reporting, national broadsheet, March 2026
Why it works
Equal representation feels like fairness. The reader's fairness instinct rewards even-handedness without asking whether the two sides are comparable.
Counter-move
Ask: what does the weight of evidence show? Equal airtime is not the same as equal credibility.
See it flagged in real articles while you read.
Get the extension