The proposal comes from a politician with three ethics violations on record . Why would we take economic advice from someone like that?

Fabricated passage — teaching example designed for clarity.

Logical fallacy / ad hominem

ad hominem — character attack replaces engagement with the argument

Why would we take economic advice from someone with three ethics violations on record?

  • speaker's character attacked
  • argument never addressed
  • conclusion drawn by association
Family
Logical fallacy
Habitat
political reporting, debate coverage, opinion pieces
Frequency
found in 9% of analyzed articles
Confused with
Straw man , Loaded language
"This is the man who said X last year — and now we're supposed to trust his analysis?"

Opinion section, regional broadsheet, March 2026

"The proposal's author has a history of getting these calls wrong. Make of that what you will."

Online commentary, political magazine, January 2026

The character of the speaker is vivid and immediate; the argument itself is abstract. Once the character is tainted, the argument feels tainted too — even though they're logically independent.

Ask: even if the speaker is wrong about everything else, is this specific argument still right?

See it flagged in real articles while you read.

Get the extension